From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:14:02 -0700 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone tried using the QCA9880 NIC from the TPLINK AC1750 AP? In-Reply-To: <20939.43650.235001.756470@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <51CB9100.9090908@candelatech.com> <20939.40669.864384.780283@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <51CBA16E.3090206@candelatech.com> <20939.43650.235001.756470@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Message-ID: <51CBADFA.4050008@candelatech.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 06/26/2013 07:59 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> Excellent! I'll go order some more! Not the most efficient way >> to get NICs, but it will do for now. > > IMO, it's better to wait until the v2.0 cards are available. Seems to be a common suggestion! I've already got a few v1 APs on order, maybe they will at least give me something to get started with. If you are at liberty to say, what sorts of issues should I expect with the v1? Or perhaps a better question: How is the v2 expected to be better? (I haven't seen mention of any ath10k bug reports yet, probably because the public generally doesn't have any NICs yet...?) Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com