From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] time: pass flags instead of multiple
	bools to timekeeping_update()
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:39:04 -0700
Message-ID: <51CC78B8.3050709__48808.3859942437$1372354852$gmane$org@linaro.org>
References: <1372329348-20841-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<1372329348-20841-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1372329348-20841-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 06/27/2013 03:35 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>
> Instead of passing multiple bools to timekeeping_updated(), define
> flags and use a single 'action' parameter.  It is then more obvious
> what each timekeeping_update() call does.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> ---
>   kernel/time/timekeeping.c |   21 ++++++++++++---------
>   1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index baeeb5c..7aed2b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>   #include "tick-internal.h"
>   #include "ntp_internal.h"
>   
> +#define TK_CLEAR_NTP (1 << 0)
> +#define TK_MIRROR (1 << 1)
> +
>   static struct timekeeper timekeeper;
>   static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
>   static seqcount_t timekeeper_seq;
> @@ -241,16 +244,16 @@ int pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier);
>   
>   /* must hold timekeeper_lock */
> -static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, bool clearntp, bool mirror)
> +static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned action)

Nit: Mind making this "unsigned int" just for consistency sake with the 
rest of the code?

thanks
-john