From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1916161883 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6BBRd2m018429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.194] (128.224.162.194) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:27:38 -0700 Message-ID: <51DE96A8.7020106@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:27:36 +0800 From: Hongxu Jia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1373539530.2389.320.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:27:39 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020706090600080704090809" --------------020706090600080704090809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/11/2013 07:14 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 11 July 2013 11:45, Phil Blundell wrote: >> I think you could still legitimately question whether having recipes in >> oe-core that are "just for LSB" is sensible and/or desirable, not least >> because dangling libraries that don't have any users are hard to test. > I was just pondering the idea of a "meta-lsb"... The reason why I choose to put nss into oe-core is I found nspr in oe-core. They both used for lsb-test and come from mozilla. Anyone has a better idea about where to put? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSPR //Hongxu > > Ross --------------020706090600080704090809 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 07/11/2013 07:14 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 11 July 2013 11:45, Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net> wrote:

I think you could still legitimately question whether having recipes in
oe-core that are "just for LSB" is sensible and/or desirable, not least
because dangling libraries that don't have any users are hard to test.

I was just pondering the idea of a "meta-lsb"...
The reason why I choose to put nss into oe-core is I found  nspr in oe-core.
They both used for lsb-test and come from mozilla.

Anyone has a better idea about where to put?

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSPR

//Hongxu

Ross

--------------020706090600080704090809--