From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] xen-blkfront: improve aproximation of required grants per request Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: <51DEB102.7060802__7174.64685808427$1373548922$gmane$org@citrix.com> References: <1373288607-1876-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <1373288607-1876-3-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1373288607-1876-3-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roger Pau Monne Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/07/13 14:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Improve the calculation of required grants to process a request by > using nr_phys_segments instead of always assuming a request is going > to use all posible segments. This isn't obviously correct to me. Why is this correct value for the number of pages that need to be granted? David > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > @@ -400,10 +400,13 @@ static int blkif_queue_request(struct request *req) > if (unlikely(info->connected != BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED)) > return 1; > > - max_grefs = info->max_indirect_segments ? > - info->max_indirect_segments + > - INDIRECT_GREFS(info->max_indirect_segments) : > - BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST; > + max_grefs = req->nr_phys_segments; > + if (max_grefs > BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST) > + /* > + * If we are using indirect segments we need to account > + * for the indirect grefs used in the request. > + */ > + max_grefs += INDIRECT_GREFS(req->nr_phys_segments); > > /* Check if we have enough grants to allocate a requests */ > if (info->persistent_gnts_c < max_grefs) {