From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932518Ab3GRKjg (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:39:36 -0400 Received: from 3.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.40.108]:60349 "EHLO mo5.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753668Ab3GRKjd (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:39:33 -0400 Message-ID: <51E7C1B2.8000206@overkiz.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:21:38 +0200 From: boris brezillon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Nicolas Ferre , Ludovic Desroches , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: atmel-ssc: remove clk_disable_unprepare call from critical section References: <1374132753-15206-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1374133720-27362-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20130718095337.GD22506@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130718095337.GD22506@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13953277545781098726 X-Ovh-Remote: 80.245.18.66 () X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeijedrvdehucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeijedrvdehucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/07/2013 11:53, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare) >> may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section. > I'm missing patches 1-4? I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML and LAKML). But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to. Here's my approach: 1) send all patches of the series to at91 maintainers (as they are directly concerned). 2) send all patches of the series LKML and LAKML 3) send each patch of the series to the persons and mailing lists concerned by this patch : contributors and maintainers (retrieved by get_maintainer.pl script) Could you tell me if I'm doing something wrong? Thanks Best Regards, Boris From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:21:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: atmel-ssc: remove clk_disable_unprepare call from critical section In-Reply-To: <20130718095337.GD22506@sirena.org.uk> References: <1374132753-15206-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1374133720-27362-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20130718095337.GD22506@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <51E7C1B2.8000206@overkiz.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 18/07/2013 11:53, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare) >> may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section. > I'm missing patches 1-4? I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML and LAKML). But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to. Here's my approach: 1) send all patches of the series to at91 maintainers (as they are directly concerned). 2) send all patches of the series LKML and LAKML 3) send each patch of the series to the persons and mailing lists concerned by this patch : contributors and maintainers (retrieved by get_maintainer.pl script) Could you tell me if I'm doing something wrong? Thanks Best Regards, Boris