From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE547C433ED for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8439A61425 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343509AbhDUV6q (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:58:46 -0400 Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]:59119 "EHLO mail-1.ca.inter.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235570AbhDUV6p (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:58:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C0C2EA049; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:58:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twWcpDTnVmQt; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.48.23] (host-45-58-219-4.dyn.295.ca [45.58.219.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dgilbert@interlog.com) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3584F2EA428; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:58:09 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: dgilbert@interlog.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/42] scsi: add scsi_result_is_good() To: Bart Van Assche , Hannes Reinecke , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org References: <20210421174749.11221-1-hare@suse.de> <20210421174749.11221-15-hare@suse.de> From: Douglas Gilbert Message-ID: <51b16b13-d4e3-f0e4-718e-357d04ed958f@interlog.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:58:08 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 2021-04-21 5:10 p.m., Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 4/21/21 10:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> +static inline bool scsi_result_is_good(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd) >> +{ >> +    return (cmd->result == 0); >> +} > > Do we really need an inline function to compare an integer with zero? How about > open-coding this comparison in the callers of this function? > Please don't open code it. Please fix it! Spot the difference: static inline int scsi_status_is_good(int status) { /* * FIXME: bit0 is listed as reserved in SCSI-2, but is * significant in SCSI-3. For now, we follow the SCSI-2 * behaviour and ignore reserved bits. */ status &= 0xfe; return ((status == SAM_STAT_GOOD) || (status == SAM_STAT_CONDITION_MET) || /* >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ <<< */ /* Next two "intermediate" statuses are obsolete in SAM-4 */ (status == SAM_STAT_INTERMEDIATE) || (status == SAM_STAT_INTERMEDIATE_CONDITION_MET) || /* FIXME: this is obsolete in SAM-3 */ (status == SAM_STAT_COMMAND_TERMINATED)); } In sg3_utils' library I ignore the last three SAM_STATs. Not sure if ignoring bit 0 is still required. Without considering SAM_STAT_CONDITION_MET a good status, someone will be scratching their head wondering why so many PRE-FETCH commands fail. That command can be used when a sequence of READs to consecutive LBAs is followed by a different (i.e. non-consecutive) READ. That last READ could be preceded by PRE-FETCH(new_LBA, IMMED). Assuming there is processing of the data from the consecutive LBAs to be done, when the time comes for READ(new_LBA) the probability of its data being in the disk's cache is increased. Doug Gilbert