From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Subject: Re: Full NAT forward and source routing - possible without packet
 marking?
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 09:29:01 +0200
Message-ID: <520045a0-9f63-04f0-cd4e-7c791762401b@plouf.fr.eu.org>
References: <1363a246-966e-59fc-7d5a-efaf12aa6b51@dynator.no>
 <4c60ba2e-3e52-f55d-96e1-699c7821940d@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4c60ba2e-3e52-f55d-96e1-699c7821940d@pobox.com>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Le 01/07/2017 =E0 22:26, Robert White a =E9crit :
> On 06/30/2017 01:55 PM, =D8yvind Kaurstad wrote:
>
> ... stuff deleted for brevity ...

Ditto.

I think you missed the point and focused on an irrelevant detail in the=20
OP. This topic is about advanced routing.