From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5204E8B3.5060605@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:03:47 +0200 From: Daniel Mack MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/20] ASoC: pxa: pxa-ssp: add DT bindings References: <1375889649-14638-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <1375889649-14638-14-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <20130807164039.GM6427@sirena.org.uk> <5203676F.6090708@gmail.com> <20130808132000.GD6427@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130808132000.GD6427@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, s.neumann@raumfeld.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, haojian.zhuang@linaro.org, cxie4@marvell.com, lars@metafoo.de, nico@linaro.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com, ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, samuel@sortiz.org, arnd@arndb.de, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, eric.y.miao@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, g.liakhovetski@gmx.de, sachin.kamat@linaro.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, djbw@fb.com, davem@davemloft.net List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08.08.2013 15:20, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:39:59AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >> Then, we should also allocate the DMA channel from the upstream device >> and pass it down to the DAI. But then again, the pxa-pcm-lib needs some >> rework, as it's currently in charge of obtaining and releasing the channel. > >> I wanted to postpone that issue until the rest of the series has settled >> and limit changes to the bare minimum for now. Does that sound feasible? > > Yup, the big problem here is the whole DT as ABI thing - what happens in > the code isn't so important but the DT is supposed to be stable. Or we > could decide that this is one of the cases that's unstable in which case > we should probably flag it up in the DT binding document if nothing else. > Alright, I agreee. It's not much code that was needed to add support for what I proposed, so I added a patch for that to my queue. Thanks for the heads-up. Daniel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack) Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:03:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 13/20] ASoC: pxa: pxa-ssp: add DT bindings In-Reply-To: <20130808132000.GD6427@sirena.org.uk> References: <1375889649-14638-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <1375889649-14638-14-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <20130807164039.GM6427@sirena.org.uk> <5203676F.6090708@gmail.com> <20130808132000.GD6427@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <5204E8B3.5060605@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08.08.2013 15:20, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:39:59AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >> Then, we should also allocate the DMA channel from the upstream device >> and pass it down to the DAI. But then again, the pxa-pcm-lib needs some >> rework, as it's currently in charge of obtaining and releasing the channel. > >> I wanted to postpone that issue until the rest of the series has settled >> and limit changes to the bare minimum for now. Does that sound feasible? > > Yup, the big problem here is the whole DT as ABI thing - what happens in > the code isn't so important but the DT is supposed to be stable. Or we > could decide that this is one of the cases that's unstable in which case > we should probably flag it up in the DT binding document if nothing else. > Alright, I agreee. It's not much code that was needed to add support for what I proposed, so I added a patch for that to my queue. Thanks for the heads-up. Daniel