From: Don Morris <don.morris@hp.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa,sched: use group fault statistics in numa placement
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:55:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5204F4C2.7000809@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130805153647.7d6e58a2@annuminas.surriel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10037 bytes --]
On 08/05/2013 03:36 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:50:32 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> Subject: mm, numa: Do not group on RO pages
>
> Using the fraction of the faults that happen on each node to
> determine both the group weight and the task weight of each
> node, and attempting to move the task to the node with the
> highest score, seems to work fairly well.
>
> Here are the specjbb scores with this patch, on top of your
> task grouping patches:
>
> vanilla numasched7
> Warehouses
> 1 40651 45657
> 2 82897 88827
> 3 116623 130644
> 4 144512 171051
> 5 176681 209915
> 6 190471 247480
> 7 204036 283966
> 8 214466 318464
> 9 223451 348657
> 10 227439 380886
> 11 226163 374822
> 12 220857 370519
> 13 215871 367582
> 14 210965 361110
>
> I suspect there may be further room for improvement, but it
> may be time for this patch to go into Mel's tree, so others
> will test it as well, helping us all learn what is broken
> and how it can be improved...
I've been testing what I believe is the accumulation of Mel's
original changes plus what Peter added via LKML and this thread
then this change. Don't think I missed any, but apologies if I
did.
Looking at it with Andrea's AutoNUMA tests (modified to automatically
generate power-of-two runs based on the available nodes -- i.e.
a 4 node system would run 2-node then 4-node, 8 node runs 2,4,8,
16 (if I had one) should do 2,4,8,16, etc.) it does look like
the "highest score" is being used -- but that's not really a
great thing for this type of private memory accessed by
multiple processes -- it looks to be all concentrating back
into a single node in the unbound cases for the runs beyond
2 nodes taking 1000+ seconds where the stock kernel takes 670
and the hard binding takes only 483. So it looks to me like the
weighting here is a bit too strong -- we don't want all the
tasks on the same node (more threads than available processors)
when there's an idle node reasonably close we can move some of
the memory to. Granted, this would be easier in cases with
really large DBs where the memory *and* cpu load are both
larger than the node resources....
Including a spreadsheet with the basic run / hard binding run
memory layout as things run and a run summary for comparison.
Don
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 9e7fcfe..5e175ae 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1355,6 +1355,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> * The values remain static for the duration of a PTE scan
> */
> unsigned long *numa_faults;
> + unsigned long total_numa_faults;
>
> /*
> * numa_faults_buffer records faults per node during the current
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 6a06bef..2c9c1dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -844,6 +844,18 @@ static unsigned int task_scan_max(struct task_struct *p)
> */
> unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count __read_mostly = 3;
>
> +struct numa_group {
> + atomic_t refcount;
> +
> + spinlock_t lock; /* nr_tasks, tasks */
> + int nr_tasks;
> + struct list_head task_list;
> +
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> + atomic_long_t total_faults;
> + atomic_long_t faults[0];
> +};
> +
> static inline int task_faults_idx(int nid, int priv)
> {
> return 2 * nid + priv;
> @@ -857,6 +869,51 @@ static inline unsigned long task_faults(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> return p->numa_faults[2*nid] + p->numa_faults[2*nid+1];
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long group_faults(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> +{
> + if (!p->numa_group)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->faults[2*nid]) +
> + atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->faults[2*nid+1]);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * These return the fraction of accesses done by a particular task, or
> + * task group, on a particular numa node. The group weight is given a
> + * larger multiplier, in order to group tasks together that are almost
> + * evenly spread out between numa nodes.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long task_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> +{
> + unsigned long total_faults;
> +
> + if (!p->numa_faults)
> + return 0;
> +
> + total_faults = p->total_numa_faults;
> +
> + if (!total_faults)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1000 * task_faults(p, nid) / total_faults;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long group_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> +{
> + unsigned long total_faults;
> +
> + if (!p->numa_group)
> + return 0;
> +
> + total_faults = atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->total_faults);
> +
> + if (!total_faults)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1200 * group_faults(p, nid) / total_faults;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Create/Update p->mempolicy MPOL_INTERLEAVE to match p->numa_faults[].
> */
> @@ -979,8 +1036,10 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env, long imp)
> cur = NULL;
>
> if (cur) {
> - imp += task_faults(cur, env->src_nid) -
> - task_faults(cur, env->dst_nid);
> + imp += task_weight(cur, env->src_nid) +
> + group_weight(cur, env->src_nid) -
> + task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid) -
> + group_weight(cur, env->dst_nid);
> }
>
> trace_printk("compare[%d] task:%s/%d improvement: %ld\n",
> @@ -1051,7 +1110,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
> .best_cpu = -1
> };
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> - unsigned long faults;
> + unsigned long weight;
> int nid, cpu, ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -1067,7 +1126,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - faults = task_faults(p, env.src_nid);
> + weight = task_weight(p, env.src_nid) + group_weight(p, env.src_nid);
> update_numa_stats(&env.src_stats, env.src_nid);
>
> for_each_online_node(nid) {
> @@ -1076,7 +1135,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
> if (nid == env.src_nid)
> continue;
>
> - imp = task_faults(p, nid) - faults;
> + imp = task_weight(p, nid) + group_weight(p, nid) - weight;
> if (imp < 0)
> continue;
>
> @@ -1122,21 +1181,10 @@ static void numa_migrate_preferred(struct task_struct *p)
> p->numa_migrate_retry = jiffies + HZ/10;
> }
>
> -struct numa_group {
> - atomic_t refcount;
> -
> - spinlock_t lock; /* nr_tasks, tasks */
> - int nr_tasks;
> - struct list_head task_list;
> -
> - struct rcu_head rcu;
> - atomic_long_t faults[0];
> -};
> -
> static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - int seq, nid, max_nid = -1;
> - unsigned long max_faults = 0;
> + int seq, nid, max_nid = -1, max_group_nid = -1;
> + unsigned long max_faults = 0, max_group_faults = 0;
>
> seq = ACCESS_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
> if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
> @@ -1148,7 +1196,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
>
> /* Find the node with the highest number of faults */
> for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
> - unsigned long faults = 0;
> + unsigned long faults = 0, group_faults = 0;
> int priv, i;
>
> for (priv = 0; priv < 2; priv++) {
> @@ -1161,6 +1209,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
> /* Decay existing window, copy faults since last scan */
> p->numa_faults[i] >>= 1;
> p->numa_faults[i] += p->numa_faults_buffer[i];
> + p->total_numa_faults += p->numa_faults_buffer[i];
> p->numa_faults_buffer[i] = 0;
>
> diff += p->numa_faults[i];
> @@ -1169,6 +1218,8 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
> if (p->numa_group) {
> /* safe because we can only change our own group */
> atomic_long_add(diff, &p->numa_group->faults[i]);
> + atomic_long_add(diff, &p->numa_group->total_faults);
> + group_faults += atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->faults[i]);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1176,11 +1227,29 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
> max_faults = faults;
> max_nid = nid;
> }
> +
> + if (group_faults > max_group_faults) {
> + max_group_faults = group_faults;
> + max_group_nid = nid;
> + }
> }
>
> if (sched_feat(NUMA_INTERLEAVE))
> task_numa_mempol(p, max_faults);
>
> + /*
> + * Should we stay on our own, or move in with the group?
> + * If the task's memory accesses are concentrated on one node, go
> + * to (more likely, stay on) that node. If the group's accesses
> + * are more concentrated than the task's accesses, join the group.
> + *
> + * max_group_faults max_faults
> + * ------------------ > ------------
> + * total_group_faults total_faults
> + */
> + if (group_weight(p, max_group_nid) > task_weight(p, max_nid))
> + max_nid = max_group_nid;
> +
> /* Preferred node as the node with the most faults */
> if (max_faults && max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid) {
>
> @@ -1242,6 +1311,7 @@ void task_numa_group(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int pid)
> atomic_set(&grp->refcount, 1);
> spin_lock_init(&grp->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->task_list);
> + atomic_long_set(&grp->total_faults, 0);
>
> spin_lock(&p->numa_lock);
> list_add(&p->numa_entry, &grp->task_list);
> @@ -1336,6 +1406,7 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int node, int pages, bool migrated)
>
> BUG_ON(p->numa_faults_buffer);
> p->numa_faults_buffer = p->numa_faults + (2 * nr_node_ids);
> + p->total_numa_faults = 0;
> }
>
> /*
>
> .
>
[-- Attachment #2: AutoNUMA Mel_PZ Summary.xlsx --]
[-- Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet, Size: 165802 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: run.out --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3923 bytes --]
numa01 on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
179.04 4096 0 88236 3031
numa01_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
110.27 4096 0 49123 2976
numa01_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
282.85 4096 0 68945 6219
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
288.28 4096 0 28452 4247
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
217.53 4096 0 39038 4911
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
558.59 4096 0 30321 9830
numa02 on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
22.41 4096 0 4233 400
numa02_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
29.26 4096 0 5724 640
numa02_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
64.31 4096 0 10779 1465
numa02_SMT on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
30.43 4096 0 3962 261
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
30.47 4096 0 4541 319
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
64.19 4096 0 5749 641
numa01 on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
518.92 4096 0 249899 13939
numa01_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
265.05 4096 0 156342 7872
numa01_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
322.30 4096 0 146232 11550
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
147.36 4096 0 27545 3868
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
280.08 4096 0 55980 8053
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
323.98 4096 0 56929 10682
numa02 on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
16.21 4096 0 4244 527
numa02_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
15.15 4096 0 5763 608
numa02_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
35.94 4096 0 7754 1472
numa02_SMT on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
29.67 4096 0 4638 427
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
15.85 4096 0 4897 302
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
36.45 4096 0 7783 721
numa01 on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
1067.32 4096 0 152427 77781
numa01_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
450.17 4096 0 240440 38428
numa01_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
529.96 4096 0 148766 39733
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
108.96 4096 0 43067 14924
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
228.77 4096 0 57781 19736
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
279.75 4096 0 48321 20551
numa02 on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
11.03 4096 0 4394 1426
numa02_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
8.12 4096 0 5604 1073
numa02_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
20.16 4096 0 6010 2671
numa02_SMT on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
15.97 4096 0 3811 493
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
8.56 4096 0 4126 296
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
20.38 4096 0 6232 806
[-- Attachment #4: Stock3.11rc4_run.out --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3923 bytes --]
numa01 on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
120.66 4096 0 48314 2345
numa01_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
110.33 4096 0 49860 3014
numa01_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
283.75 4096 0 70962 5537
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
217.40 4096 0 31633 3203
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
217.52 4096 0 41759 4841
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
560.21 4096 0 39048 9879
numa02 on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
22.04 4096 0 4140 343
numa02_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
29.27 4096 0 8121 671
numa02_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
65.09 4096 0 12140 1475
numa02_SMT on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
47.72 4096 0 4556 424
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
30.45 4096 0 4320 299
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND on 2 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
64.93 4096 0 4384 641
numa01 on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
297.28 4096 0 207781 9202
numa01_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
281.40 4096 0 261270 8203
numa01_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
324.01 4096 0 208260 11654
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
126.75 4096 0 52259 3970
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
273.75 4096 0 64228 8514
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
311.88 4096 0 63381 10960
numa02 on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
16.89 4096 0 5091 592
numa02_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
15.16 4096 0 6512 617
numa02_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
35.67 4096 0 11728 1473
numa02_SMT on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
26.92 4096 0 4319 426
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
16.00 4096 0 6096 324
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND on 4 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
36.39 4096 0 8588 724
numa01 on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
669.71 4096 0 212552 64899
numa01_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
483.45 4096 0 212077 37364
numa01_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
495.48 4096 0 223279 38543
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
108.61 4096 0 50008 16326
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
245.13 4096 0 72037 19834
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
292.22 4096 0 69993 22849
numa02 on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
11.55 4096 0 5316 1516
numa02_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
8.10 4096 0 5591 1164
numa02_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
20.03 4096 0 11918 2662
numa02_SMT on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
16.88 4096 0 4916 549
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
8.68 4096 0 6176 324
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND on 8 Nodes: ElapsedTime PageSize MajFaults MinFaults ContextSwtch
20.47 4096 0 8904 802
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 200+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 15:20 [PATCH 0/18] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V5 Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 01/18] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 02/18] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 7:54 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 7:54 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-29 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-29 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 7:54 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 7:54 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 03/18] mm: numa: Account for THP numa hinting faults on the correct node Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 0:33 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-17 0:33 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-17 1:26 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-17 1:26 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 04/18] mm: numa: Do not migrate or account for hinting faults on the zero page Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 8:11 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 8:11 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 05/18] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 06/18] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 07/18] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-25 10:40 ` [PATCH] sched, numa: migrates_degrades_locality() Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 8:44 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 8:44 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 08/18] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 1:31 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-17 1:31 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-31 9:07 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:07 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-31 9:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 4:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 4:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 15:38 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 15:38 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 09/18] sched: Add infrastructure for split shared/private accounting of NUMA hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 2:17 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-17 2:17 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-31 9:08 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:08 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 10/18] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 11/18] sched: Check current->mm before allocating NUMA faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 12/18] sched: Set the scan rate proportional to the size of the task being scanned Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 13/18] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 5:22 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-17 5:22 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-31 9:13 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:13 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 14/18] sched: Remove check that skips small VMAs Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 15/18] sched: Set preferred NUMA node based on number of private faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-18 1:53 ` [PATCH 15/18] fix compilation with !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Rik van Riel
2013-07-18 1:53 ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-31 9:19 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:19 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-26 11:20 ` [PATCH 15/18] sched: Set preferred NUMA node based on number of private faults Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-26 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 9:29 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:29 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 16/18] sched: Avoid overloading CPUs on a preferred NUMA node Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-15 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 8:23 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-16 8:23 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-16 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 15:55 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-16 15:55 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-16 16:01 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-16 16:01 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-17 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-17 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 7:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 7:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 15:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 15:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 17/18] sched: Retry migration of tasks to CPU on a preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-25 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 10:03 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 10:03 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 10:07 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 10:07 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-01 5:13 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 5:13 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 15:46 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 15:46 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 18/18] sched: Swap tasks when reschuling if a CPU on a target node is imbalanced Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-15 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 9:41 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-16 9:41 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 4:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 4:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-01 15:48 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 15:48 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 0/18] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V5 Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-15 20:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 15:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-16 15:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-25 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 11:57 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 11:57 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 16:11 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 16:11 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-01 15:51 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-01 15:51 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-25 10:38 ` [PATCH] mm, numa: Sanitize task_numa_fault() callsites Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-31 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-25 10:41 ` [PATCH] sched, numa: Improve scanner Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH] mm, sched, numa: Create a per-task MPOL_INTERLEAVE policy Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-25 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-26 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-26 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-26 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-26 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-26 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-26 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH] mm, numa: Change page last {nid,pid} into {cpu,pid} Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-01 22:33 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 22:33 ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-30 11:38 ` [PATCH] sched, numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups for shared faults Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 15:45 ` Don Morris
2013-07-31 15:45 ` Don Morris
2013-07-31 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-02 16:47 ` [PATCH -v3] " Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-02 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-02 16:50 ` [PATCH] mm, numa: Do not group on RO pages Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-02 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-02 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-02 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-05 19:36 ` [PATCH] numa,sched: use group fault statistics in numa placement Rik van Riel
2013-08-05 19:36 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-09 13:55 ` Don Morris [this message]
2013-08-28 16:41 ` [PATCH -v3] sched, numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups for shared faults Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-28 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-28 17:10 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-28 17:10 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 6:23 ` [PATCH,RFC] numa,sched: use group fault statistics in numa placement Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 6:23 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-01 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-01 16:35 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 16:35 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2] " Rik van Riel
2013-08-01 22:36 ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-30 13:58 ` [PATCH 0/18] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V5 Andrew Theurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5204F4C2.7000809@hp.com \
--to=don.morris@hp.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.