From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8CFe-0007WM-NN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:42:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8CFW-00078P-7w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:42:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]:54635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8CFW-00078I-1N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:42:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y10so1722229pdj.8 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 09:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <52066D7C.4020607@twiddle.net> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 06:42:36 -1000 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1376075958-21932-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Disassembly with external objdump List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Claudio Fontana , proljc@gmail.com On 08/10/2013 05:45 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Well, it depends. If we're going to dump all the in-tree > disassemblers and always use an external objdump, that's fine. It's tempting, given that the only internal disassemblers that are not missing opcodes are for the extinct cpus. r~