From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758007Ab3HMOsx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:48:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:45868 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757562Ab3HMOsv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:48:51 -0400 Message-ID: <520A474F.9080500@baylibre.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:48:47 +0200 From: Benoit Cousson Organization: BayLibre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I CC: tony@atomide.com, rob.herring@calxeda.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node References: <1376300221-15172-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <520A32CF.1010701@baylibre.com> <520A4685.7050503@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <520A4685.7050503@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/08/2013 16:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as >>> two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. >> >> Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? >> >> Do you have dedicated control on each output? > > Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. > You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. > > [1] -> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Great, thanks. Can we merge that one safely if the driver changed are not done yet? Regards, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bcousson@baylibre.com (Benoit Cousson) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:48:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node In-Reply-To: <520A4685.7050503@ti.com> References: <1376300221-15172-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <520A32CF.1010701@baylibre.com> <520A4685.7050503@ti.com> Message-ID: <520A474F.9080500@baylibre.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 13/08/2013 16:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as >>> two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. >> >> Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? >> >> Do you have dedicated control on each output? > > Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. > You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. > > [1] -> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Great, thanks. Can we merge that one safely if the driver changed are not done yet? Regards, Benoit