From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD9E29E0E
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:34:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A1CAC005
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5217640F.7050900@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:30:55 -0400
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last <
	BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568
References: <52165830.8050006@redhat.com> <52176134.6090905@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <52176134.6090905@sgi.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

On 08/23/2013 09:18 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 08/22/13 13:28, Brian Foster wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I hit an assert on a debug kernel while beating on some finobt work and
>> eventually reproduced it on unmodified/TOT xfs/xfsprogs as of today. I
>> hit it through a couple different paths, first while running fsstress on
>> a CRC enabled filesystem (with otherwise default mkfs options):
>>
>> (These tests are running on a 4p, 4GB VM against a 100GB virtio disk,
>> hosted on a single spindle desktop box).
> 
> Eeek.
> 
> So both crashes are directory related. What is the top XFS kernel commit
> for these tests?
> 

Hi Mark,

It was the latest from at some point yesterday. I don't think I've
pulled since, so I'm at:

3e3c51ce xfs: add xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field

> Have you seen this on earlier versions of the kernel?
> 

Well I hit an issue first on my dev. branch for finobt hacking, which is
currently based on a slightly older commit:

2c2bcc07 xfs: call roundup_64() to calculate the min_logblks

Unfortunately I don't have the precise error/stack from that failure on
hand to double check whether it's the exact same failure. I can try to
regenerate it a bit later today.

Brian

> Thanks,
> 
> --Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs