From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC6829DFB for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:57:02 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <52176A2C.9060708@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:57:00 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568 References: <52165830.8050006@redhat.com> <52176134.6090905@sgi.com> <5217640F.7050900@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5217640F.7050900@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 08/23/13 08:30, Brian Foster wrote: > On 08/23/2013 09:18 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> On 08/22/13 13:28, Brian Foster wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I hit an assert on a debug kernel while beating on some finobt work and >>> eventually reproduced it on unmodified/TOT xfs/xfsprogs as of today. I >>> hit it through a couple different paths, first while running fsstress on >>> a CRC enabled filesystem (with otherwise default mkfs options): >>> >>> (These tests are running on a 4p, 4GB VM against a 100GB virtio disk, >>> hosted on a single spindle desktop box). >> >> Eeek. >> >> So both crashes are directory related. What is the top XFS kernel commit >> for these tests? >> > > Hi Mark, > > It was the latest from at some point yesterday. I don't think I've > pulled since, so I'm at: > > 3e3c51ce xfs: add xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field > >> Have you seen this on earlier versions of the kernel? >> > > Well I hit an issue first on my dev. branch for finobt hacking, which is > currently based on a slightly older commit: > > 2c2bcc07 xfs: call roundup_64() to calculate the min_logblks > > Unfortunately I don't have the precise error/stack from that failure on > hand to double check whether it's the exact same failure. I can try to > regenerate it a bit later today. > > Brian > >> Thanks, >> >> --Mark. > Good, I just want to make sure the common directory mods for the file type patch was not the cause. I will try to recreate it too. Thanks. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs