From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A784E005B4 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail157-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.253) by VA3EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.7.40.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:39:07 +0000 Received: from mail157-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail157-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057C22A016A; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VS-4(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h8275bh1de097hz2dh2a8h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh1155h) Received: from mail157-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail157-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1377797870624304_7542; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.236]) by mail157-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734F8100073; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by VA3EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (10.7.99.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:37:35 +0000 Received: from az84smr01.freescale.net (10.64.34.197) by 039-SN1MMR1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:37:34 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.63] ([10.29.244.63]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r7THbWYj025009; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:37:33 -0700 Message-ID: <521F8600.4000201@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:33:52 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , References: <521E28B7.7040105@freescale.com> <521F3426.9010303@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <521F3426.9010303@freescale.com> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: GPU tests on master next - core-image-x11 - sfp X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:39:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/29/2013 08:44 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > On 08/28/2013 06:53 PM, Christian Betz wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Daiane Angolini >> wrote: >>> I've been running some tests on master-next. >>> >>> I used the following commands. Do you know any other I could run? >>> >>> >>> RESULTS: >>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glxgears >>> 108 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21.508 FPS >>> >>> $ DISPLAY=:0 es2gears_x11 >>> 1494 frames in 5.0 seconds = 298.740 FPS >>> >>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 >>> glmark2 Score: 212 >>> >>> $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen >>> glmark2 Score: 229 >> >> this is great news. thank you for sharing. >> >> does this imply that windowed mode acceleration is working now? (i >> seem to recall it was broken) > > I think so, but how can I test it (for sure)? I was told: If you're looking to verify the alpha.2 windowed mode optimizations, compare frame rates to the alpha.1 binaries for es2 applications in windowed mode: es2gears_x11, glmark2-es2, /opt/viv_samples/vdk/tutorial*_es20 They're roughly 10x higher, and comparable to fullscreen performance. You can see that glx hasn't been optimized because windowed mode for glxgears is still ~22 fps, where the fullscreen is ~300. -- Daiane