From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756744Ab3H3Pp4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:45:56 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:60259 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755146Ab3H3Ppz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:45:55 -0400 Message-ID: <5220BE49.2030409@arm.com> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:46:17 +0100 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Deacon , Russell King - ARM Linux , Catalin Marinas CC: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates References: <1377788142-21388-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <52206EE0.5020907@arm.com> <20130830114309.GW6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130830140406.GE12160@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130830140406.GE12160@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2013 15:45:52.0839 (UTC) FILETIME=[020DBD70:01CEA598] X-MC-Unique: 113083016455300501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/08/13 15:04, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:43:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >>> On 29/08/13 15:55, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >>>> >>>> This patch series adds support to configure the rate and enable the >>>> event stream for architected timer. The event streams can be used to >>>> impose a timeout on a wfe, to safeguard against any programming error >>>> in case an expected event is not generated or even to implement >>>> wfe-based timeouts for userspace locking implementations. This feature >>>> can be disabled(enabled by default). >>>> >>>> Since the timer control register is reset to zero on warm boot, CPU >>>> PM notifier is added to save and restore the value. >>>> >>> Hi Russell, >>> >>> Can you have a look at this series ? >>> If you are OK, can I have your ACK on arm specific changes(PATCH 2/5) ? >> >> I think it would be more value to have someone from ARM Ltd ack it, >> because they will know the code much better than I do. > > Looks good to me, so for patch 2/5: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > Thanks Will and Russell. Hi Catalin, Can I have your ACK for ARM64 changes(PATCH 3/5) so that Daniel can accept my pull request ? Regards, Sudeep From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (Sudeep KarkadaNagesha) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:46:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 0/5] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates In-Reply-To: <20130830140406.GE12160@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1377788142-21388-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <52206EE0.5020907@arm.com> <20130830114309.GW6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130830140406.GE12160@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <5220BE49.2030409@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 30/08/13 15:04, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:43:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >>> On 29/08/13 15:55, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >>>> >>>> This patch series adds support to configure the rate and enable the >>>> event stream for architected timer. The event streams can be used to >>>> impose a timeout on a wfe, to safeguard against any programming error >>>> in case an expected event is not generated or even to implement >>>> wfe-based timeouts for userspace locking implementations. This feature >>>> can be disabled(enabled by default). >>>> >>>> Since the timer control register is reset to zero on warm boot, CPU >>>> PM notifier is added to save and restore the value. >>>> >>> Hi Russell, >>> >>> Can you have a look at this series ? >>> If you are OK, can I have your ACK on arm specific changes(PATCH 2/5) ? >> >> I think it would be more value to have someone from ARM Ltd ack it, >> because they will know the code much better than I do. > > Looks good to me, so for patch 2/5: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > Thanks Will and Russell. Hi Catalin, Can I have your ACK for ARM64 changes(PATCH 3/5) so that Daniel can accept my pull request ? Regards, Sudeep