From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGWai-0006wm-Ty for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:03:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGWad-0005hF-GO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:03:00 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:28789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGWad-0005df-7c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:02:55 -0400 Message-ID: <5224B6AC.1010702@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 18:02:52 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5c0f4c470f93a477cf12751a8106d728a3c319d8.1376049708.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <871u5zhtaa.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5208FF71.7010208@siemens.com> <520901AC.6000609@suse.de> <5224B539.5050004@siemens.com> <5224B5B8.1090206@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5224B5B8.1090206@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 1.6 1/2] memory: Provide separate handling of unassigned io ports accesses List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Cc: Peter Maydell , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Paolo Bonzini On 2013-09-02 17:58, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 02.09.2013 17:56, schrieb Jan Kiszka: >> On 2013-09-02 15:52, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 12 August 2013 16:39, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote= : >>>> Am 12.08.2013 17:29, schrieb Jan Kiszka: >>>>> Accesses to unassigned io ports shall return -1 on read and be igno= red >>>>> on write. Ensure these properties via dedicated ops, decoupling us = from >>>>> the memory core's handling of unassigned accesses. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - avoid breakage in ioport.h for user build >>>> >>>> Looks OK, but if you want Anthony to apply this for rc3 then please >>>> repost as a full, top-level series. >>> >>> It looks like this never happened, so this bug is still present >>> in master :-( [noticed by stsquad since integratorcp is busted too]. >> >> I suppose the repost just fell through the cracks at the end of the >> release cycle. Let me re-repost the whole thing, CC'ing stable. >=20 > I vaguely remember you reposting 2/2 top-level only and asking Anthony > to fix his tool instead, which was quite apparently not helpful. ;) Well, I wasn't expecting this to happen within the release cycle. But I would still appreciate having to do such thread-breaking updates in the future. Jan --=20 Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux