From: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@codeaurora.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:30:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E4C0C.6080309@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CC46F4-F6CE-4B1A-B0D5-E4BB779755B8@codeaurora.org>
On 9/9/2013 3:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>
>> On 9/9/2013 2:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> - msm8960-cdp.dtb
>>>>>>>>>> + msm8960-cdp.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> + apq8074-dragonboard.dtb
>>>>>>>>> Please add boards alphabetically.
>>>>>>>> Will do.
>>>>>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> armada-370-mirabox.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> armada-370-rd.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>>>> index 0000000..5b7b6a0
>>>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/ is getting really crowded. It's been working best if the SoC
>>>>>>>>> family or vendor is used as a prefix to keep things a bit more organized. In
>>>>>>>>> that spirit, prefixing these with msm-<foo> makes sense. Can you please do so?
>>>>>>>> Sure. But the board is called an APQ8074 and we wanted to keep the naming consistent with that.
>>>>>>> If we do this we should use qcom, not msm as the prefix. Match the device tree vendor prefix.
>> Coming back to this, it would be better if the naming to be consistent with what we call our ARCH - msm and not qcom.
>> msm8974-dragonboard signifies quite clearly what the board is.
> I was saying qcom,apq8074-dragonboard or we can do the dir thing as we don't have that mean qcom/msm device trees.
>
> - k
Sure, that's fine. If there's a consensus on the name to match the
compatible strings, could you send a patch out to rename the older
dtsi's and I can add the Dragonboard support with it.
Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rvaswani@codeaurora.org (Rohit Vaswani)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:30:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E4C0C.6080309@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CC46F4-F6CE-4B1A-B0D5-E4BB779755B8@codeaurora.org>
On 9/9/2013 3:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>
>> On 9/9/2013 2:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> - msm8960-cdp.dtb
>>>>>>>>>> + msm8960-cdp.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> + apq8074-dragonboard.dtb
>>>>>>>>> Please add boards alphabetically.
>>>>>>>> Will do.
>>>>>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> armada-370-mirabox.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> armada-370-rd.dtb \
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>>>> index 0000000..5b7b6a0
>>>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/ is getting really crowded. It's been working best if the SoC
>>>>>>>>> family or vendor is used as a prefix to keep things a bit more organized. In
>>>>>>>>> that spirit, prefixing these with msm-<foo> makes sense. Can you please do so?
>>>>>>>> Sure. But the board is called an APQ8074 and we wanted to keep the naming consistent with that.
>>>>>>> If we do this we should use qcom, not msm as the prefix. Match the device tree vendor prefix.
>> Coming back to this, it would be better if the naming to be consistent with what we call our ARCH - msm and not qcom.
>> msm8974-dragonboard signifies quite clearly what the board is.
> I was saying qcom,apq8074-dragonboard or we can do the dir thing as we don't have that mean qcom/msm device trees.
>
> - k
Sure, that's fine. If there's a consensus on the name to match the
compatible strings, could you send a patch out to rename the older
dtsi's and I can add the Dragonboard support with it.
Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-09 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 19:32 [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:32 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:32 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] defconfig: msm_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8974 Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:32 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:53 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 19:53 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 20:31 ` [PATCH] ARM: msm: Remove irqs-*.h files for DT based targets Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:55 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 20:55 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 21:50 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard Olof Johansson
2013-09-06 21:50 ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-09 17:48 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 17:48 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 19:17 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 19:17 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 19:29 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 19:29 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 19:48 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 19:48 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 21:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 21:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 21:25 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 21:25 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 21:42 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 21:42 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 22:04 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 22:04 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 22:30 ` Rohit Vaswani [this message]
2013-09-09 22:30 ` Rohit Vaswani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522E4C0C.6080309@codeaurora.org \
--to=rvaswani@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.