From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6FB7F3F for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:30:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5237404B.3010309@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:30:51 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568 References: <52165830.8050006@redhat.com> <52325369.1070001@sgi.com> <20130916154423.GA455@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20130916154423.GA455@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Brian Foster , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/16/13 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:51:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> The secret to tripping over the bug is run the test until fsstress >> fills the filesystem before removing the files. So an error >> handling? >> >> I use the test: >> >> #!/bin/sh >> >> ltp/fsstress -z -s 1378390208 -fsymlink=1 -n9999999 -p4 -d /test2 >> cd /test2 >> sync >> rm -rf * >> >> If your filesystem is smaller, decrease the -n to make the test faster. >> >> I have still not gotten a core, though Michael Semon sent one. > > It would be useful if we could wire this up for xfstests > Nod --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs