From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Bmv-0008By-Dv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:27:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Bms-0004FC-8p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:27:09 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:58170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Bmr-0004Eo-WC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9JEPx5O143533 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:27:01 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dpws1r74d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:27:00 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:26:55 -0400 References: <20171009225623.29232-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> From: Stefan Berger Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:26:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171009225623.29232-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Message-Id: <523bf8e7-0be0-0db9-83da-4e7d7449562f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/42] TPM: code cleanup & CRB device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: amarnath.valluri@intel.com On 10/09/2017 06:55 PM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi, > > I accumulated a series of patch doing some TPM code cleanup while > doing review. I removed some dead code, simplified other parts, and > tried to isolate implementation of the backend and frontend by using a > new TPMIf interface. I solved a few issues, and added some FIXME for > what should be tackled. Finally, I implemented a simple CRB device > (tpm 2.0) that is work in progress for now - it works fine with > passthrough, but swtpm/libtpms with win10 has some issues that need > more investigations. > > seabios CRB support is required for TPM 2.0 & emulation > (https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/seabios/2017-October/011839.html) > > Comments/review welcome! Are you going to post a v2 soon? Stefan