From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:50:38 +0100 Message-ID: <5240391E.8030904@eu.citrix.com> References: <20130920155737.GB16734@aepfle.de> <523C7213.7060606@eu.citrix.com> <524008D702000078000F5582@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <52402A9F.7030303@eu.citrix.com> <52404C7602000078000F5860@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52404C7602000078000F5860@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Olaf Hering , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/09/13 13:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.09.13 at 13:48, George Dunlap wrote: >> (Though again, I think that at some >> point, if it's not important enough for someone to implement, it's not >> important enough to keep supporting.) > I accept that this is one way of viewing things, but as someone > implementing hypervisor side stuff for people even if neither I nor > customers of my employer immediately need it, I think it is not > completely off to expect some symmetry here: I think it is > reasonable for someone to point out deficiencies in areas (s)he > doesn't normally work on, and expect those responsible for > these areas to pick this up unless it's completely off. Fair enough. :-) -George