From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from co9ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.27] helo=co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VOQ6x-0002sK-Uu for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:44:56 +0000 Message-ID: <52416D88.6030906@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:46:32 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: gpmi-nand driver and jffs2 support References: <522062B4.4080709@digi.com> <201309241150.09313.marex@denx.de> In-Reply-To: <201309241150.09313.marex@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "fabio.estevam@freescale.com" , Hector Palacios , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B409=E6=9C=8824=E6=97=A5 17:50, Marek Vasut =E5=86=99= =E9=81=93: > Hello Huang, > > Can you please explain what is the exact difference between the NAND la= yout when > using JFFS2 in FSL 2.6.35 and in mainline with your patches ? In FSL 2.6.35, there are some free space in the OOB; while in mainline we use all the free space in the OOB. > Is there any way to mount JFFS2 written with FSL 2.6.35 on current main= line? > Thus far, neither me nor Hector were able to mount such partition with = the same > result. The gpmi driver in FSL 2.6.35 is different from the mainline. The two drivers are not compatible to each other. thanks Huang Shijie > Best regards, > Marek Vasut >