From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABAE7F3F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:12:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5241B9F5.2020500@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:12:37 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: lock the AIL before removing the buffer item References: <1380002476-18839-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1380002476-18839-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1380002476-18839-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/24/13 01:01, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Regression introduced by commit 46f9d2e ("xfs: aborted buf items can > be in the AIL") which fails to lock the AIL before removing the > item. Spinlock debugging throws a warning about this. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- Looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs