From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752668AbdDLGYV (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 02:24:21 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:33944 "EHLO mail-lf0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752502AbdDLGYR (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 02:24:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] printk: fix double printing with earlycon To: Petr Mladek Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Hurley , Jiri Slaby , Robin Murphy , Steven Rostedt , "Nair, Jayachandran" , Sergey Senozhatsky References: <20170315102854.1763-1-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> <20170405202006.18234-1-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> <20170410142214.GA3452@pathway.suse.cz> <0514db53-4f8b-fa08-f461-902de85777ee@linaro.org> <20170411074325.GC3452@pathway.suse.cz> From: Aleksey Makarov Message-ID: <52661d42-b418-116a-0ee8-70cd0a24c51d@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:24:13 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170411074325.GC3452@pathway.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/11/2017 10:43 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Mon 2017-04-10 21:00:35, Aleksey Makarov wrote: >> >> >> On 04/10/2017 05:22 PM, Petr Mladek wrote: >>> On Wed 2017-04-05 23:20:00, Aleksey Makarov wrote: [..] >> Thank you for review. Can you (or anybody else) ACK it? >> I am going to resend the whole series without those empty lines. >> May I add your Acked-by:? > > Sure. Feel free to use: > > Acked-by: Petr Mladek > > The meaning of the tags is a bit unclear. Acked-by means that > the maintainer agrees with the idea. But it does not necessarily > means that she reviewed the code in details. I agree with the idea > and did the review, so I used the Reviewed-by tag. > > Also you do not need to resend the patchset just because the two > empty lines. Sergey agrees. I will wait day or two and push > all three patches into the printk.git if nobody complains > in the meantime. I could remove the two empty lines when doing so. Ok, then I will not resend it. > Thanks a lot for the fix and patience. Thank you for reviewing and acking it. Aleksey Makarov