All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: blk-mq 5-8 times slower for bmap-tools
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:22:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <526e40ca8f426252377be21f935ddcdec93cb197.camel@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPybu_3QT_qTojTUXFhJFQKVsbhnWUmvyQ0zb5MwDJ5hsECf=A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2193 bytes --]

On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 11:04 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hello Ming
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:30 AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> > One problem found from your iostat log is that looks there is ~30sec
> > idle period between IO activities when blk-mq is enabled.
> 
> During all the test the LED on the device was blinking.
> 
> But a closer look to dmesg reveals a lot of this messages:
> 
> [  196.929811] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#3 data cmplt err -71 uas-tag 1
> inflight: CMD
> [  196.929822] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#3 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 00 04 00
> 68 00 04 00 00
> [  227.764379] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#4 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag
> 2 inflight: CMD OUT
> [  227.764389] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#4 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 00 04 04
> 68 00 04 00 00
> [  227.766555] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#3 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag
> 1 inflight: CMD
> [  227.766562] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#3 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 00 04 00
> 68 00 04 00 00
> [  227.784312] scsi host6: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start
> [  227.913672] usb 2-2: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
> [  227.944842] scsi host6: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success
> [  231.416133] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#1 data cmplt err -71 uas-tag 10
> inflight: CMD
> [  231.416147] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#1 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 00 06 d5
> e8 00 04 00 00
> 
> And they take around 30 secons (227-196)
> 
> 
> Maybe this is a hw issue? I will bring the reader home tonight and see
> if I can replicate the bug with my notebook
> 
> > 
> > Maybe it is related with timeout, given we had big change in v4.17 timeout code,
> > and we also fixed one scsi_mq timeout related issue recently, and the patch[1] has
> > been merged to v4.18 release already.
> 
> I tried with v4.18-rc4 (latest one packaged in debian experimental)
> and after 3 runs, 2 were fine (27 sec), but the last one was over a
> minute.

Is it possible that this is fixed by "block: really disable runtime-pm
for blk-mq"?

That fix went into Debian's version 4.17.14-1, but is not yet in any
4.18-based package.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-22 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-17 17:31 blk-mq 5-8 times slower for bmap-tools Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2018-08-17 17:35 ` Paolo Valente
2018-08-17 17:39   ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2018-08-17 17:41     ` Jens Axboe
2018-08-17 17:49       ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2018-08-17 21:23         ` Jens Axboe
2018-08-17 17:42     ` Paolo Valente
2018-08-17 17:52       ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2018-08-17 23:43 ` Ming Lei
     [not found]   ` <CAPybu_2ke4usj9Qwr9iSKTymAk1510pzZnZAgLemRB+cK4Se1A@mail.gmail.com>
2018-08-20  8:30     ` Ming Lei
2018-08-20  9:04       ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2018-08-20  9:55         ` Ming Lei
2018-08-20  9:56           ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2018-08-20 10:15             ` Ming Lei
2018-08-20 11:42               ` Ming Lei
2018-08-20 11:45                 ` Ming Lei
2018-08-22 19:22         ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2018-08-22 22:02           ` Ming Lei
2018-08-23  0:51             ` Ben Hutchings
2018-08-23  2:17               ` Ming Lei
2018-08-23  6:29           ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=526e40ca8f426252377be21f935ddcdec93cb197.camel@decadent.org.uk \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.