On 29 November 2017 at 11:34PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Christian Zigotzky >> Hi Bjorn, >> >> Thank you for your answer. I have tried to boot the kernel 4.15 RC1 (built >> without the patch above) with the boot argument "pci=pcie_scan_all" but >> without any success. >> >> Just for info: >> >> The CPU is a PA Semi “PWRficient” PA6T-1682M. This device combines dual >> 1.8GHz PowerPC cores with a 2MB L2 cache, dual channel DDR2 memory >> controllers and 24 SerDes >> channels. The PowerPC cores adhere to the Power ISA v2.04, and support >> 64-bit extensions. They feature a double precision FPU and a VMX (AltiVec) >> vector unit. They each have a 64kB I-cache and a 64kB D-cache. >> The SerDes channels support PCI Express, XAUI and SGMII protocols. The >> “ENVOI” I/O subsystem which drives them includes caching, offload and DMA >> resources to maximise I/O >> performance. >> Nemo uses the AMD/ATI SB600 South Bridge to provide various integrated I/O >> functions including SATA/PATA ports, USB and audio. The SB600 connects to >> the CPU via a PCIe x4 link. This is termed an “A-link II Express” link by >> ATI/AMD. The design team determined early in the development of Nemo that >> the link’s behaviour as an endpoint does not comply fully with the PCI >> Express specification. Specifically, it requires the root complex to use >> non-zero device numbers in type 0 configuration cycles to enumerate all the >> devices within the SB600. This is related to the PC architecture and is used >> to allow SB600 devices appear on logical bus 0. >> >> More information about the Nemo board: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AmigaOne_X1000 >> http://www.a-eon.com/?page=x1000 >> http://www.amigaos.net/hardware/35/amigaone-x1000 >> >> Please find attached the complete "lspci -vv" and dmesg output. > > Thanks.  Can you collect the "lspci -vv" output as root?  The one you > attached wasn't as root and doesn't include the PCI capability > information, which we need so we can tell which devices appear as > conventional PCI and which as PCIe. > > It would also be helpful if you could send plain-text email because > the linux-pci list discards fancy email > (http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html#taboo). > > It looks like the SB600 devices actually appear on bus 05 (not 00), > right?  I see these devices (among others): > >   00:10.0 PCI bridge: PA Semi, Inc PWRficient PCI-Express Port >   00:11.0 PCI bridge: PA Semi, Inc PWRficient PCI-Express Port >   01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: [AMD/ATI] Barts XT [Radeon HD 6870] >   05:12.0 SATA controller: [AMD/ATI] SB600 Non-Raid-5 SATA >   05:14.4 PCI bridge: [AMD/ATI] SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge >   06:05.0 Ethernet controller: RTL-8100/8101L/8139 > > So 00:10.0 and 00:11.0 are bridges leading to buses 01 and 05-06. > Maybe 00:11.0 is the Downstream Port that leads to this magic "A-Link > II Express" thing? > > But I don't think all those SB600 devices on bus 05 are PCIe devices. > It would certainly be unconventional to have a PCIe device (00:11.0) > at the upstream end of a link and conventional PCI devices (05:12.0, > 05:13.0, 05:13.1, etc) at the downstream end, with no visible PCIe > port. > > The usual thing would be that 00:11.0 would be a Root Port or a Switch > Downstream Port leading to a Link, and the other end of the Link would > terminate in either a Switch Upstream Port or an Upstream Port > embedded in an Endpoint. > > We'll have to think about how to handle this.  But the complete "lspci > -vv" output as root will have more useful information. > > Bjorn Hi Bjorn, Thanks for your reply. Please find attached the complete "lspci -vv" output as root. Cheers, Christian