From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754254Ab3KCRzh (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Nov 2013 12:55:37 -0500 Received: from mo6.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.32.228.6]:59506 "EHLO mo6.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753719Ab3KCRzg (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Nov 2013 12:55:36 -0500 Message-ID: <52768E15.1020107@overkiz.com> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:55:33 +0100 From: boris brezillon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guenter Roeck CC: Wim Van Sebroeck , Fabio Porcedda , Nicolas Ferre , Guenter Roeck , Yang Wenyou , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: various fixes References: <20131029075028.GF19704@spo001.leaseweb.com> <1383043053-3520-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131029154519.GB9266@roeck-us.net> <526FE0DA.1020308@overkiz.com> <20131029164323.GF9266@roeck-us.net> <526FEEE7.7030708@overkiz.com> <527660C3.2050509@overkiz.com> <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 10260888801519499279 X-Ovh-Remote: 78.236.240.82 (cha74-5-78-236-240-82.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeiledrhedvucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeiledrhedvucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2013 17:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/03/2013 06:42 AM, boris brezillon wrote: >> Hello Guenter, >> >> Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch, >> and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ? >> >> If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch and including >> your suggestions. >> > Yes, sorry, I was waiting for your patches. Done. BTW, thanks for your review :-). > > Thanks, > Guenter > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon) Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:55:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: various fixes In-Reply-To: <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net> References: <20131029075028.GF19704@spo001.leaseweb.com> <1383043053-3520-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131029154519.GB9266@roeck-us.net> <526FE0DA.1020308@overkiz.com> <20131029164323.GF9266@roeck-us.net> <526FEEE7.7030708@overkiz.com> <527660C3.2050509@overkiz.com> <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <52768E15.1020107@overkiz.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/11/2013 17:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/03/2013 06:42 AM, boris brezillon wrote: >> Hello Guenter, >> >> Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch, >> and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ? >> >> If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch and including >> your suggestions. >> > Yes, sorry, I was waiting for your patches. Done. BTW, thanks for your review :-). > > Thanks, > Guenter >