From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [linux-3.10 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:16:34 +0000 Message-ID: <527B84A2.3060806@citrix.com> References: <527B829E.4070907@citrix.com> <1383826370.32399.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1383826563.32399.14.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1383826563.32399.14.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, keir@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, "xen.org" , Paul Durrant , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/11/13 12:16, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 12:12 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 12:07 +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > >>> The 3.10 stable tree is missing dc62ccaccfb139d9b04bbc5a2688a4402adbfab3 >>> (xen-netback: transition to CLOSED when removing a VIF) which fixes a >>> regression introduced in the above patch. >>> >>> This depends on ea732dff5cfa10789007bf4a5b935388a0bb2a8f (xen-netback: >>> Handle backend state transitions in a more robust way) which fixes an >>> issue with some old Windows frontends. >>> >>> Both of these should be backported to stable. >> >> Yes, this was also discussed yesterday in reply to one of the failures. >> Has someone pinged DaveM already? > > Nevermind, I just did it... As did I... David