From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B2C54FD0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4919D2076C for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EzUnXeBg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4919D2076C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRfHz-0008UX-DN for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:05:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRfGv-0007ni-2f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:04:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRfGt-0003oK-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:04:20 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:51998 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRfGt-0003jF-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:04:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587661456; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iNfHwH1+Ntuses6bMhYLuFNVchgVKHdXMKnAo9rwcDk=; b=EzUnXeBg/RKkgSS+DyL/uvD9klFam3wmPa6IEVBEo+pGdUf4kLmh5P1r8XPxgwHDWMK9mT nrmIrZvgmBqQpXkeAykCamwIsdFdegG4mBmT1WqtxOnLNoa/KzIv1LZtIEWW8zz61idgkb AEenQ8Fu+vyrr3LAZnssty7BoqkXnL8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-234-lWmj-__kOHOFEpmDk6xBgg-1; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:04:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: lWmj-__kOHOFEpmDk6xBgg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969EE87308E; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A8BB5C1D2; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.19]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513791809541; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:04:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Cleber Rosa To: Peter Maydell Message-ID: <529508877.9650370.1587661453005.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200312193616.438922-1-crosa@redhat.com> <1182067639.1655516.1584421185287.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20200317141257.GA5724@localhost.localdomain> <87sgi49uf6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.10.112.178, 10.4.195.26] Thread-Topic: QEMU Gating CI Thread-Index: DgfSa9udgyRTKA+gpMmc7tBfgATwNw== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=crosa@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/23 03:23:21 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Thomas Huth , Beraldo Leal , Erik Skultety , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Wainer Moschetta , Markus Armbruster , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , QEMU Developers , Willian Rampazzo , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Maydell" > To: "Markus Armbruster" > Cc: "Fam Zheng" , "Thomas Huth" , "Bera= ldo Leal" , "Erik > Skultety" , "Alex Benn=C3=A9e" , "Wainer Moschetta" , > "QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" = , "Willian Rampazzo" > , "Cleber Rosa" , "Philippe Mathie= u-Daud=C3=A9" , "Eduardo > Habkost" > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 8:53:49 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI >=20 > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 16:33, Markus Armbruster wrote= : > > Peter Maydell writes: > > > I think we should start by getting the gitlab setup working > > > for the basic "x86 configs" first. Then we can try adding > > > a runner for s390 (that one's logistically easiest because > > > it is a project machine, not one owned by me personally or > > > by Linaro) once the basic framework is working, and expand > > > from there. > > > > Makes sense to me. > > > > Next steps to get this off the ground: > > > > * Red Hat provides runner(s) for x86 stuff we care about. > > > > * If that doesn't cover 'basic "x86 configs" in your judgement, we > > fill the gaps as described below under "Expand from there". > > > > * Add an s390 runner using the project machine you mentioned. > > > > * Expand from there: identify the remaining gaps, map them to people / > > organizations interested in them, and solicit contributions from thes= e > > guys. > > > > A note on contributions: we need both hardware and people. By people I > > mean maintainers for the infrastructure, the tools and all the runners. > > Cleber & team are willing to serve for the infrastructure, the tools an= d > > the Red Hat runners. >=20 > So, with 5.0 nearly out the door it seems like a good time to check > in on this thread again to ask where we are progress-wise with this. > My impression is that this patchset provides most of the scripting > and config side of the first step, so what we need is for RH to provide > an x86 runner machine and tell the gitlab CI it exists. I appreciate > that the whole coronavirus and working-from-home situation will have > upended everybody's plans, especially when actual hardware might > be involved, but how's it going ? >=20 Hi Peter, You hit the nail in the head here. We were affected indeed with our abilit= y to move some machines from one lab to another (across the country), but we'= re actively working on it. >From now on, I'll give you an update every time a significant event occurs = on our side. > thanks > -- PMM >=20 >=20 Thanks for checking in! - Cleber.