Re: mistakes in code vs. maintainer flow mistakes (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)

[Ove Karlsen <mail@ovekarlsen.com>]

Ok, I just revisited the "Sarah Sharp" "no more abuse" blogpost, where I 
wrote a long comment on the problem she was describing, only to find 
that my comment was not there. I felt a certain degree of provocation, 
since this was a serious and honest post, without any kind of abuse, 
from someone who has researched religion for 10 years.

Later she says she summed up her views, in an LKML post, stating 
"Professional behavior should be the default."

And I am wondering where that comment went. I don´t know if Sarah 
deliberately removed it, or filtered it, however a lot of people are 
like this, "professional behaviour" does not include religious viewpoints.

And what is that other than a facistic abuse.

And do know that religion can be other than christianity, and that even 
believers, can do worldclass code.

I remember the post, and since this has been a topic of discussion, many 
places, I am going to repeat the main parts of it here.

Good conduct historically comes from monotheism, that states "God has no 
partners". That encourages good conduct, in accordance to the nature he 
created you with. As The Quran states "He created you in the best of 
stature". Polytheism is forbidden, and polytheism is about idols, 
phallic objects, overriding nature with pretense behaviour. Which in 
turn is facism.

If one is going to discuss behaviour, I think this is the only basis for 
this, and unbehaved people are online, everywhere. I think the 
difference is really in ones religion.

I did a lot of research on this, which can be read on my blog.

www.ovekarlsen.com

I also do some open-source worldclass DSP plugins, and music production, 
links to this are also on my page.

Theoretically I do believe having a superordinate God of Almightyness, 
(Lord Of The Heavens And The Earth) help defeat many idolaterous and 
obscure theories and beliefs, that makes people behave irrationaliy, and 
provocative.

So for good behaviour, and a beneficient society, one should always work 
for monotheism. And this is not at all unintelligent. This is simply far 
above the level of many, so there I guess it is often missed in a 
discussion, that would lead to any real fix. Without it you are simply 
playing with semantics, and renaming the problem, favouring some group 
of facism.

Peace Be With You.