From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grygorii Strashko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:18:15 +0200 Message-ID: <52AEE177.1090802@ti.com> References: <1386871973-26762-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52ACAD50.6060003@ti.com> <52ADB3BC.3080605@ti.com> <52ADB47E.1080505@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52ADB47E.1080505-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: Errors-To: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org To: Sekhar Nori , Santosh Shilimkar , Linus Walleij Cc: linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On 12/15/2013 03:54 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 07:20 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. Looks like everything are in place. Thanks. > > Forgot to mention that I have not been able to test them today though. > They will hit linux-next only after I have been able to test them and I > send a pull request to arm-soc or Linus W. > Regards, -grygorii From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753147Ab3LPKVH (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:21:07 -0500 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:60932 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752191Ab3LPKVF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:21:05 -0500 Message-ID: <52AEE177.1090802@ti.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:18:15 +0200 From: Grygorii Strashko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sekhar Nori , Santosh Shilimkar , Linus Walleij CC: , , , , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch References: <1386871973-26762-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52ACAD50.6060003@ti.com> <52ADB3BC.3080605@ti.com> <52ADB47E.1080505@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <52ADB47E.1080505@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.145.75] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: f9c360f5-3d1e-4c3c-8703-f45bf52eff6b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/15/2013 03:54 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 07:20 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. Looks like everything are in place. Thanks. > > Forgot to mention that I have not been able to test them today though. > They will hit linux-next only after I have been able to test them and I > send a pull request to arm-soc or Linus W. > Regards, -grygorii From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:18:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch In-Reply-To: <52ADB47E.1080505@ti.com> References: <1386871973-26762-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52ACAD50.6060003@ti.com> <52ADB3BC.3080605@ti.com> <52ADB47E.1080505@ti.com> Message-ID: <52AEE177.1090802@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/15/2013 03:54 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 07:20 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree at vger.kernel.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. Looks like everything are in place. Thanks. > > Forgot to mention that I have not been able to test them today though. > They will hit linux-next only after I have been able to test them and I > send a pull request to arm-soc or Linus W. > Regards, -grygorii