From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:39:55 -0500 Message-ID: <52AF2CDB.3080406@ti.com> References: <1386871973-26762-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52ACAD50.6060003@ti.com> <52ADB3BC.3080605@ti.com> <52AF17A6.3060007@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52AF17A6.3060007-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: Errors-To: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org To: Sekhar Nori , Linus Walleij Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Monday 16 December 2013 10:09 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 08:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. >> > The $subject series (2 patches) don't seems to be on your branch. > Ofcourse Linus needs to ack them before they can be considered. I have couple of comments as well so refresh of the series would be needed. Linus, Can you also please look at them. Regards, Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754873Ab3LPQk0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:40:26 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:60079 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754466Ab3LPQkW (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:40:22 -0500 Message-ID: <52AF2CDB.3080406@ti.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:39:55 -0500 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sekhar Nori , Linus Walleij CC: Grygorii Strashko , Rob Herring , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch References: <1386871973-26762-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52ACAD50.6060003@ti.com> <52ADB3BC.3080605@ti.com> <52AF17A6.3060007@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <52AF17A6.3060007@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 16 December 2013 10:09 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 08:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. >> > The $subject series (2 patches) don't seems to be on your branch. > Ofcourse Linus needs to ack them before they can be considered. I have couple of comments as well so refresh of the series would be needed. Linus, Can you also please look at them. Regards, Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:39:55 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch In-Reply-To: <52AF17A6.3060007@ti.com> References: <1386871973-26762-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52ACAD50.6060003@ti.com> <52ADB3BC.3080605@ti.com> <52AF17A6.3060007@ti.com> Message-ID: <52AF2CDB.3080406@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 16 December 2013 10:09 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 08:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 12:41 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Linus, Sekhar, >>> >>> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series depends on: >>>> [1] "[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/8/22 >>>> [2] "[PATCH v6 0/6] gpio: daVinci: cleanup and feature enhancement" >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree at vger.kernel.org/msg05970.html >>>> [3] "gpio: davinci: get rid of DAVINCI_N_GPIO" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/405 >>>> [4] "gpio: introduce GPIO_DAVINCI kconfig option" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/435 >>>> [5] "gpio: davinci: use chained_irq_enter/chained_irq_exit API" >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/428 >>>> >>>> To handle all dependencies, I've created a branch where I collected all >>>> "ready to merge" patches (all acks added in patches) and this series: >>>> - https://github.com/grygoriyS/linux.git >>>> - branch: keystone-master-gpio-for-next >>>> >>> Can one of you pull all these patches ? >> >> So I went through my backlog and queued all that I think is ready. Here >> is the branch. Let me know if there is anything else missing. >> > The $subject series (2 patches) don't seems to be on your branch. > Ofcourse Linus needs to ack them before they can be considered. I have couple of comments as well so refresh of the series would be needed. Linus, Can you also please look at them. Regards, Santosh