From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vandana Kannan Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/bdw: Add support for DRRS to switch RR Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:36:07 +0530 Message-ID: <52B1738F.4030503@intel.com> References: <1387258107-19232-1-git-send-email-vandana.kannan@intel.com> <1387258107-19232-6-git-send-email-vandana.kannan@intel.com> <20131217123000.GJ22448@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <52B15BD8.8090602@intel.com> <20131218090155.GX22448@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B5DFBF05 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:06:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131218090155.GX22448@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Dec-18-2013 2:31 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:54:56PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: >> On Dec-17-2013 6:00 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:27AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: >>>> For Broadwell, there is one instance of Transcoder MN values per transcoder. >>>> For dynamic switching between multiple refreshr rates, M/N values may be >>>> reprogrammed on the fly. Link N programming triggers update of all data and >>>> link M & N registers and the new M/N values will be used in the next frame >>>> that is output. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan >>>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep Bhat >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>>> index 209be3c..183cfd7 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>>> @@ -798,9 +798,15 @@ intel_dp_set_m2_n2(struct intel_crtc *crtc, struct intel_link_m_n *m_n) >>>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >>>> enum transcoder transcoder = crtc->config.cpu_transcoder; >>>> >>>> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8) { >>>> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) { >>>> + I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_M1(transcoder), >>>> + TU_SIZE(m_n->tu) | m_n->gmch_m); >>>> + I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_N1(transcoder), m_n->gmch_n); >>>> + I915_WRITE(PIPE_LINK_M1(transcoder), m_n->link_m); >>>> + I915_WRITE(PIPE_LINK_N1(transcoder), m_n->link_n); >>>> + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8) { >>> >>> Ouch. Double ouch later. >>> -Chris >>> >> We are looking to write in M1/N1 registers for BDW and M2/N2 registers >> for HSW and below. What is your suggestion on how to implement this ? > > if (gen >= 8) { > } else if (gen >= 5) { > } > > Or as you use gen >= 5 && gen < 8 elsewhere, a feature macro would be > even more sensible, HAS_DRRS(). > -Chris > I will make this change to if (gen >= 8) { } else if (gen >= 5) { } - Vandana