From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dbg_rw_guest_mem: Enable debug log
	output
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:49:52 -0500
Message-ID: <52CADEB0.3080802@terremark.com>
References: <1388857936-664-1-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com>		
	<1388857936-664-3-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com>		
	<20140104211319.GC9395@phenom.dumpdata.com>		
	<52C87C1C.5080908@terremark.com>	
	<1389022105.31766.54.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>	
	<52CADCD1.3060107@terremark.com>
	<1389026661.31766.85.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1389026661.31766.85.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 01/06/14 11:44, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 11:41 -0500, Don Slutz wrote:
>> Because I did not think that it needs to be in 4.4.0.
> Oh, did you mean it was optional in the sense of could be deferred from
> 4.4.0 to 4.5.0 versus being entirely discardable?

Yes, that is what I was trying to say.

>
>>    I have no issue with moving it into the 1st patch.

Will make this change it's own patch.

    -Don Slutz

> As usual a separate patch for a separate change would be best.
>
> Ian.
>