From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dbg_rw_guest_mem: Conditionally enable debug log output Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:30:59 +0000 Message-ID: <52CEDCD30200007800112096@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <1389140748-26524-1-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com> <1389140748-26524-4-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com> <1389177510.4883.11.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <52CD60AA.9010607@terremark.com> <1389199626.4883.112.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140108170442.GA75747@deinos.phlegethon.org> <1389203062.27473.8.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140108163822.30b6f87a@mantra.us.oracle.com> <1389261548.27473.42.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <52CEC978.7040705@terremark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52CEC978.7040705@terremark.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Don Slutz Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 09.01.14 at 17:08, Don Slutz wrote: > Based on Mukesh's statement, attached is the rebased version of this patch > (labeled v3). I included Mukesh's ack. Unless this is meant just for reviewing purposes (albeit even then it's likely problematic), could you please get used to sending patch revisions with mail subjects (i.e. not retaining the prior version indicator), so there is a reasonable chance to reconstruct things by searching just the titles in a mail archive. (It's still fine - at least as far as I'm concerned - to reply to an earlier version, thus tying things into a single thread on the archive.) Jan