From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44406)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1W8K93-00073n-9a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:40:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1W8K8v-0003xC-OH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:40:49 -0500
Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=36416 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1W8K8v-0003vZ-CK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:40:41 -0500
Message-ID: <52E85BDF.8060706@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:39:43 +0800
From: Qiao Nuohan <qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1390890126-17377-1-git-send-email-qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<1390890126-17377-9-git-send-email-qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<52E799BF.4040902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <52E7B28D.60305@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E7B28D.60305@redhat.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 08/13] dump: add API to write dump header
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Ekaterina Tumanova <tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/28/2014 09:37 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I seem to recall that Qiao Nuohan stated that he (*) couldn't test this
> feature on any other architecture than i686/x86_64.
>
> So my proposal is, let's not block the series based on just this one
> point. Let's review it and allow it to be merged (if there are no other
> problems).
>
> Then you and/or Christian could post a small patch that allows the
> feature to work on s390x too, checking also that your patch doesn't
> regress it on x86_64. Perhaps Qiao Nuohan could re-test at that time for
> regressions (on x86_64), and follow up with his (*) Tested-by.
>
> Does it sound acceptable?

I will retest it at that time. Thanks for your help on other architecture.

And unfortunately, Ekaterina, I have just noticed that I failed to receive
your mails. :(

BTW, I am male.

-- 
Regards
Qiao Nuohan