From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outrelay07.libero.it ([212.52.84.111]:39169 "EHLO outrelay07.libero.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750975AbaBMToG (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:44:06 -0500 Message-ID: <52FD2086.6060105@libero.it> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:44:06 +0100 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Mamedov CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Add btrfs device disk-usage command In-Reply-To: <20140214012343.19792fb0@natsu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: References: <52FD1AEC.1020700@libero.it> <20140214012343.19792fb0@natsu> Hi Roman, On 02/13/2014 08:23 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:20:12 +0100 > Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > >> >> Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli >> --- [...] > > Why not just name it "du"? Think about the current handy feature of shortening > commands by only specifying parts of the keywords. "btrfs dev du" would seem > more intuitive than calling it as "btrfs dev disk" or "btrfs dev disk-u". > > Or simply "usage", because "...device disk..." is redundant, device is already > a disk, so it can easily be "btrfs device usage". Yes, I agree about "usage" GB -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5