From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outrelay06.libero.it ([212.52.84.110]:46833 "EHLO outrelay06.libero.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598AbaBNS1w (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:27:52 -0500 Message-ID: <52FE602D.7060109@libero.it> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:27:57 +0100 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Mamedov CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage References: <1392318441-9224-1-git-send-email-kreijack@libero.it> <52FD1AD6.50500@libero.it> <20140214012810.26297146@natsu> <52FD21B4.4050502@libero.it> <20140214030045.415e21da@natsu> <52FE58EF.1060901@libero.it> <20140215001110.76d8226f@natsu> In-Reply-To: <20140215001110.76d8226f@natsu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/14/2014 07:11 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:57:03 +0100 > Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > >> On 02/13/2014 10:00 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: >>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100 >>> Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are right >>>> when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ? >>> >>> Personally I don't see the point of being super-pedantic here, i.e. "look this >>> is not just filesystem usage, this is filesystem CHUNK usage"... Consistency >>> of having a matching "dev usage" and "fi usage" would have been nicer. >> >> >> What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ? > > Uhm? Had to reread this several times, but it looks like you're repeating > exactly the same question that I was already answering in the quoted part. > > To clarify even more, personally I'd like if there would have been "btrfs dev > usage" and "btrfs fi usage". Do not see the need to specifically make the 2nd > one "chunk-usage" instead of simply "usage". I don't like "usage" because it to me seems to be too much generic. Because both "btrfs filesystem disk-usage" and "btrfs device disk-usage" report about chunk (and/or block group) infos, I am investigating about - btrfs filesystem chunk-usage - btrfs device chunk-usage Regards GB -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5