From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Anderson Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:11:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v5 33/33] riscv: Add Sipeed Maix support In-Reply-To: References: <20200228210552.615672-1-seanga2@gmail.com> <20200228210552.615672-34-seanga2@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52ab0a03-947e-f7e6-eb6d-d3eed07a3416@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 3/4/20 2:47 AM, Rick Chen wrote: > Hi Sean > > This patch series become larger and larger from v1 with 11 patches to > v5 with 33 patches. I didn't intend for it to balloon so large. My original goal for this revision was just to get the SPI and MMC slots working. However, I discovered that I would need to implement a pinmux slot and GPIOs for the MMC slot to work (since I think that is the primary motivating factor for using U-Boot on this board, as opposed to the native bootloader). > You shall just fix the suggestions from the previous version in the > next version. I will try to do that :) > Additional extra features and subsystem drivers that you want to > support, you shall send them individually instead of mixing them > together. In the past, I have been told to keep this sort of thing in one series (e.g. by Bin Meng). I'm really not sure what things I should split off and which I should keep together. > > If you can separate them into different series(spi, gpio,led , > pinctrl, watchdog, those drivers were not present in v1) and they will > not block the reviewing schedule each other. Hm, ok. Perhaps split those off into series which depend on this one? > Narrow down the dependency, it can help to speed up the patch work. > And I am happy to help pulling the RISC-V relative patchs via riscv > tree ASAP. Ok, I will try and get another version out which fixes the feedback I have gotten on those patches. > > Thanks, > Rick > > > Thanks for the feedback. --Sean