From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A9B7FBB3; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711630622; cv=none; b=DgotwKjrBWJPzww8N1UOZJttK82weLQfg01nYRUx/QZA1DEw73Z2fjDw+DzuZUCV7hPqQF1ZA333VBwk7IHyKlAPqdKKJZ1YU2Ep4LbNFumT7Q2Pv+PMOMgH04jIv19J03a46NNf8JM8qgq/nv4WYnuCUROw+KcFEjJVgrw1bTg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711630622; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7Fc2f2taPu8F/E1+eeZWRcLoS6XcYuD22fmjyeCfJiE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Eiqk1vJ3fnYMxB4tYOcdNHprO0X5uFt72fZTO34unqse7olcKSq7JKVDRQjNUClGgWhExII4e2kxp0aKXkhMHwVNurAMebgBMSJBbKs+3/EyPDy5A+Ew0crHyxT8OfHRm7B0WgiGLUVkFSR1/AQ2AeEFTuZrPQDuyZRr1TdmEOc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V53SK2XWbz1wnbZ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:56:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.93]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2706F1A016C; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:56:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:56:50 +0800 Message-ID: <52f333be-9370-4865-b0fb-5ca6825ef39a@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:56:49 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm: remove isolate_lru_page() Content-Language: en-US To: kernel test robot , Andrew Morton CC: , , Linux Memory Management List , , Miaohe Lin , Naoya Horiguchi , David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , Zi Yan , Hugh Dickins , Jonathan Corbet , , Baolin Wang References: <20240327141034.3712697-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <202403282057.pIA3kJoz-lkp@intel.com> From: Kefeng Wang In-Reply-To: <202403282057.pIA3kJoz-lkp@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) On 2024/3/28 20:22, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Kefeng, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > [also build test ERROR on v6.9-rc1] > [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything next-20240328] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kefeng-Wang/mm-migrate-add-isolate_movable_folio/20240327-221513 > base: linus/master > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327141034.3712697-4-wangkefeng.wang%40huawei.com > patch subject: [PATCH 3/6] mm: remove isolate_lru_page() > config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240328/202403282057.pIA3kJoz-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240328/202403282057.pIA3kJoz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403282057.pIA3kJoz-lkp@intel.com/ > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): This changed locally, but missing this when rebase on new branch, will fix. > >>> mm/migrate_device.c:388:9: error: call to undeclared function 'isolate_lru_page'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 388 | if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { > | ^ > mm/migrate_device.c:388:9: note: did you mean '__isolate_free_page'? > mm/internal.h:487:12: note: '__isolate_free_page' declared here > 487 | extern int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order); > | ^ > 1 error generated. > >