From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karim Yaghmour Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH lttng-modules] LTTng logger ABI Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:13:42 -0500 Message-ID: <53023536.9050007__2121.02386071837$1392653692$gmane$org@opersys.com> References: <1392502096-1900-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <53022631.90209@opersys.com> <1718413437.26031.1392653324422.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by ltt.polymtl.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFQpI-0003Kp-N8 for lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:13:54 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id e16so23771229qcx.38 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:13:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1718413437.26031.1392653324422.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org On 14-02-17 11:08 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > I'd be tempted to ask: is that the behavior of ftrace when receiving an > event larger than a page through trace_marker ? I've never bothered looking it up to be quite honest. > We could indeed truncate the event, but it would increase complexity > compared to the current patch. So I'm tempted to wait a bit before doing so. What's the maximum length of events lttng-logger will take? We just truncate in the Android user-space library that writes the atrace events. -- Karim Yaghmour CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com http://twitter.com/karimyaghmour