From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:20:59 +0900 Message-ID: <530BE1EB.8070602@samsung.com> References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <5302B306.8090503@samsung.com> <6032891.ndY8FikAMY@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:33471 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472AbaBYAVK (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:21:10 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id um1so7253239pbc.19 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:21:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: John Stultz , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Daniel Lezcano , Ilho Lee , Thomas Abraham , Kumar Gala , Kukjin Kim , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 02/20/14 18:03, Olof Johansson wrote: [...] > > I.e. I'd be OK with an > ARCH_EXYNOS/ARCH_TEGRA/ARCH_IMX/ARCH_, but I don't think we > should add more finegrained options than that globally on ARM64, at > least not until truly proven to be needed. We're trying to push back > against new per-SoC Kconfig entries on 32-bit as well right now. > OK, agreed. - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:20:59 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family In-Reply-To: References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <5302B306.8090503@samsung.com> <6032891.ndY8FikAMY@wuerfel> Message-ID: <530BE1EB.8070602@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/20/14 18:03, Olof Johansson wrote: [...] > > I.e. I'd be OK with an > ARCH_EXYNOS/ARCH_TEGRA/ARCH_IMX/ARCH_, but I don't think we > should add more finegrained options than that globally on ARM64, at > least not until truly proven to be needed. We're trying to push back > against new per-SoC Kconfig entries on 32-bit as well right now. > OK, agreed. - Kukjin