From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WO26y-0003ZE-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:39:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WO26s-00046j-Qf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:39:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5321659A.4060400@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:00:26 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392904246-15575-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1392904246-15575-2-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5306094B.4010608@redhat.com> <53060B40.9010903@ozlabs.ru> <53060BB8.5010302@redhat.com> <532126DE.8050608@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <532126DE.8050608@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] boot: extend get_boot_devices_list() to ignore suffixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Andreas Faerber Il 13/03/2014 04:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: > I am about to respin the series against the latest QOM stuff and I am about > to change commit message in the "The benefit would be to QEMU in having > simpler code" part - what part of QEMU gets simpler? I am avoiding fixing > SLOF and I am fixing QEMU so QEMU gets (liiiiittle) bit more complicated > but not simpler The benefit would be to QEMU in having consistent naming of devices across all architectures. Or just ignore me. Paolo