From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] SP800-90A Deterministic Random Bit Generator Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <532AA307.504@ladisch.de> References: <2396177.vxvG2ljJL8@myon.chronox.de> <5770301.bQ9lKffXf3@myon.chronox.de> <3662681.npTzbSq3ye@myon.chronox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: aquini@redhat.com, jeremy.wayne.powell@gmail.com To: Stephan Mueller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de ([31.47.254.18]:48288 "EHLO dehamd003.servertools24.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753223AbaCTIM6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:12:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3662681.npTzbSq3ye@myon.chronox.de> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Stephan Mueller wrote: > This is a clean-room implementation of the DRBG defined in SP800-90A. Why? I guess it's for certification? > +static bool drbg_fips_continuous_test(struct drbg_state *drbg, > + unsigned char *buf) > ... > + ret = memcmp(drbg->prev, buf, drbg_blocklen(drbg)); > + ... > + /* invert the memcmp result, because the test shall pass when the > + * two compared values do not match */ > + if (ret) > + return true; > + else > + return false; This looks strange. The return value of memcmp() is not really a boolean, and the code appears not to match the comment because the numeric value of ret is not actually inverted. How about this: ret = memcmp(...); ... /* the test shall pass when the compared values are not equal */ return ret != 0; Regards, Clemens