From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: domain_vgic_init: Check xzalloc_* return Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:03:50 +0000 Message-ID: <532C46C60200007800126909@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <1395323486-9891-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1395404371.19839.14.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <532C3EAB02000078001268B2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1395405464.19839.27.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WQz75-0007Lc-3F for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:03:55 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1395405464.19839.27.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Julien Grall , stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, tim@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 21.03.14 at 13:37, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Since I'm not actively >> using the ARM port, I'm not sure we wouldn't introduce unnecessary >> risks if I did the backports. Therefore I'd like to put up for discussion >> whether one of the ARM maintainers wouldn't be in a better position >> to do this now that we need to do backports there - both in terms of >> tracking what needs backporting as well as actually applying them. > > I'd be happy to do both of these things. Thanks - so be it then. Jan