From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yc3RlbiBCw7ZnZXJzaGF1c2Vu?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] remote-hg: do not fail on invalid bookmarks Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:41:37 +0100 Message-ID: <532DBD41.6080008@web.de> References: <532CA557.20007@web.de> <10F8010F-96E2-45E0-B6D4-C3709AED3C28@quendi.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Antoine Pelisse To: Junio C Hamano , =?UTF-8?B?VG9yc3RlbiBCw7ZnZXJzaGF1?= =?UTF-8?B?c2Vu?= , Max Horn X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 22 17:42:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WROzg-0005lV-Ml for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:42:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751375AbaCVQlz convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:41:55 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:49727 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751199AbaCVQly (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:41:54 -0400 Received: from [192.168.209.26] ([78.72.74.102]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLgZ5-1WRg6X3yTb-000rml; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:41:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QsJVYqjFDzqPaKkUc+ic6EBUwxIJfTYZKGatSyI9IGatvJYNTFn aS+2mafKbOfZcL7RuaCL5UvNbyM+EpTSaLOFE9KENm9afKJTi3lFmY4BPOYIoA6yvO3rImQ 1Eejbo1awVOYE7ZsBedQ+G75dU11K3P+wRGre/iO3nuc6gT7RPIyjp6ZhvP+/HMr574J1Xh 0I7Rp3wcAJPVw677omvtw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2014-03-21 23.32, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Max Horn writes: >=20 >> Hi Torsten, >> >> On 21.03.2014, at 21:47, Torsten B=C3=B6gershausen w= rote: >> >>> On 2014-03-21 12.36, Max Horn wrote: >>> All tests passed :-), >> >> Excellent. >> >>> thanks from my side. >>> comments inline, some are debatable >> >> Thanks for having a close look and for the constructive feedback! >> Unfortunately, I won't have time to look into this for the next 7 da= ys >> or so. I wouldn't mind if the patch gets queued with the changes you >> suggest; but of course that might be a tad too much to ask for, so I= 'll >> also be happy to do a "proper" re-roll, but then it has to wait a bi= t. >=20 > In the meantime, I'll pile this on top as "SQUASH???". Test OK under Linux and Mac, (so this is a little ACK).