From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel De Graaf Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xen: rename various functions referencing dom0 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:47:22 -0400 Message-ID: <5334480A.2020908@tycho.nsa.gov> References: <1395921128-7086-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1395921128-7086-6-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1395934454.22909.156.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1395934454.22909.156.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Xiantao Zhang , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/27/2014 11:34 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 07:52 -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: >> Most of these functions actually act on the hardware domain, so change >> their names to reflect this. >> >> Command line parameters and variables based on those parameters are >> excluded since those changes would be user-visible, as are any public >> headers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf >> Cc: Ian Campbell > > Did there used to be some ARM bits which have now moved? Otherwise I've > forgotten which bit of the below I'm supposed to be maintainer of ;-) Yes, there used to be ARM bits here, but they were moved to #4. While I mentioned that in the header, I neglected to adjust the Cc list here. -- Daniel De Graaf National Security Agency