From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTaTa-0004z5-Um for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTaTS-0000OQ-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:21:54 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58410 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTaTR-0000OL-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: <5335AFA7.9010306@suse.de> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:21:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140328105709.21018.88000.stgit@bahia.local> <20140328105756.21018.57522.stgit@bahia.local> <20140328181326.22c0a6a5@bahia.local> In-Reply-To: <20140328181326.22c0a6a5@bahia.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 6/8] virtio-scsi: use virtio wrappers to access headers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Kurz Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws Am 28.03.2014 18:13, schrieb Greg Kurz: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:57:56 +0100 > Greg Kurz wrote: >> @@ -519,8 +521,8 @@ static void virtio_scsi_push_event(VirtIOSCSI *s, = SCSIDevice *dev, >> >> evt =3D req->resp.event; >> memset(evt, 0, sizeof(VirtIOSCSIEvent)); >> - evt->event =3D event; >> - evt->reason =3D reason; >> + evt->event =3D virtio_tswap32(event); >> + evt->reason =3D virtio_tswap32(reason); >=20 > My bad again, it should be: >=20 > + evt->event =3D virtio_tswap32(event, vdev); > + evt->reason =3D virtio_tswap32(reason, vdev); Pure bikeshedding, but wouldn't it make sense to have the vdev as first argument? Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg