From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5335B354.5000404@xenomai.org> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:37:24 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5072ab06.2340b.144fe2d11ed.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> <5332BF1F.3000504@xenomai.org> <76a8b1fe.2477d.144fe96fb16.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> <5332D759.7010806@xenomai.org> <23d0b1ec.250da.144fecc28e4.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> <53335E2F.4040608@xenomai.org> <594fd0f5.8241.14501ff6aba.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> <53341923.3050401@xenomai.org> <73b7ea7c.981e.14507c57f41.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> In-Reply-To: <73b7ea7c.981e.14507c57f41.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] imx6q xenomai ipipe-3.0-imx6q List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?5bWM5YWl5byP5bel56iL5biI?= Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" On 03/28/2014 09:19 AM, 嵌入式工程师 wrote: > THis is my newtest on my imx6q board with ipipe-3.0-imx6q Note that the latency test only really make sense if no other real-time activity is running on the board. Otherwise you are not really measuring the system worst case latency. -- Gilles.