From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51F67F73 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:42:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53399B06.5010400@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:42:46 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix bad hash ordering References: <20140328173430.622616177@sgi.com> <20140331001055.GD16336@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20140331001055.GD16336@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: XFS Mailing List On 03/30/14 19:10, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:33:34PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> Fix the fix directory "bad hash ordering" bug introduced in >> commit f5ea1100. > ... > >> --- >> A C program that generates this problem can be found at: >> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-03/msg00373.html >> >> A xfstest for this bug is coming from Hannes Frederic Sowa. > > Can you convert this program to an xfstest yourself so that I can > commit the regression test at the same time I commit an updated > fix? We narrowed the iterations down to make it a quick test. I have every confidence that Hannes can generate the test in a timely manner and I will help in any way possible. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs