From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <533A99AD.4010404@xenomai.org> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:49:17 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <36553bb2.3800.1451b23ccfc.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> In-Reply-To: <36553bb2.3800.1451b23ccfc.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] imx6q xenomai ipipe-3.0-imx6q List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?5bWM5YWl5byP5bel56iL5biI?= Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" On 04/01/2014 04:35 AM, 嵌入式工程师 wrote: > Hello Gilles ,this is my test about xenomai ,this can also effect the > my program and the latency test > ,thanks 。 For the third time: running the latency test while other real-time activity is running gives meaningless results. Here, the following piece of code: > for(i=1;i<1000;i++) > for(j=1;j k=i*j; Takes 1.6ms to execute, this is what the latency test measures. -- Gilles.